Monday, March 27, 2006

Who Is Really Controlling Suicidal US Foreign Policy?

Why is it that Bush and his controllers seem to be so inept? They have run their country into extreme debt, their military forces are spread thin in the Middle East, and it seems they are planning another war for Iran (if the recent acceleration of the WMD propaganda machine is any indication). Perhaps the answer will also explain why American foreign policy seems to not be American at all, but Israeli.

In this paper, John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago's Department of Political Science and Stephen M.Walt of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government contend that the centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy is its intimate relationship with Israel. The authors argue that although often justified as reflecting shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives, the U.S. commitment to Israel is due primarily to the activities of the “Israel Lobby." This paper goes on to describe the various activities that pro-Israel groups have undertaken in order to shift U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction.

But this leaves out the juiciest details. For example, what are we to think of the recent Israeli-Mauritanian black-mail scandal? As the editors at Signs of the Times say: is instructive as to the way in which the state of Israel manipulates the governments and media of foreign nations into blind obedience to the Israeli agenda, specifically:

"lured with tempting offers, including sexual relations with foreign women, bribe money, and promises of support in securing prominent job positions in return for their help in the Israeli endeavor"

Unbeknownst to the journalists [and politicians], the sexual encounters were then recorded, later to be used to blackmail the journalists (and politicians) by the Israeli embassy.

The Saudi paper explained that the Israeli ambassador would later approach the journalists [and politicians], threatening to release the videotapes if they did not cooperate with Israel.

These tactics have been used for decades by Israeli agencies within the U.S. to such an extent that, today, all branches of the American government have been entirely co-opted by Israel. The aforementioned Israeli agenda, by the way, is an eternal racist war in the Middle East until the Arab populations therein have been exterminated or completely subdued (most likely the former).

Of course, the end result of such a campaign will very likely include the destruction of the state of Israel itself along with the Jewish populations that live there. Then again, given that the Semitic Jews of the Middle East are, from a genetic point of view, almost identical to their Semitic, Arab Muslim brothers, it is probably more correct to say that the goal of Israeli leaders, who themselves are not of Semitic origin, is the destruction of all Semitic peoples of the Middle East.

Perhaps this explains why the US was so eager for war in Iraq, just who Congress was listening to, and why Iraq seems, against all reason, to be falling into civil war. Because this is JUST what the Israelis have been pushing for this last decade:

It is an idea pushed long and hard by the Israelis, as proposed in Oded Yinon’s A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties. “Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon,” Yinon wrote. It is precisely “inter-Arab confrontation” initiated through false flag provocative operations occurring currently in Iraq.

Perhaps it also explains why in their recent almost-excellent piece on 9/11 "conspiracy theories," New York Magazine writers Mark Jacobson and Janelle Nanos relate the following:

[...the Mossad theory] dovetails with the baseless rumor, widely believed in Arab countries, that 4,000 Jewish World Trade Center workers were told to stay home that day, showing that conspiracy theory can be tricky terrain. [emphasis mine]
A common theory, especially in the Arab world, holds that Israel orchestrated the attacks in order to bring the U.S. into conflict with Israel’s enemies. Evidence cited ranges from the [cle]arly spurious and deeply anti-Semitic (the oft-heard, oft-refuted canard that Jews were told to leave the towers before the attacks) to the apparently true but unexplainable. (Five men who were seen filming the attacks in Liberty Park were later apprehended and found by the Forward to have ties to Mossad.) [emphasis theirs]

but fail to mention that this is not simply a baseless, anti-Semitic rumour. It may not be entirely true, but even Haaretz Daily reports that the Israeli company Odigo received warnings before the attacks. Also:

According to reporter Christopher Bollyn, Zim American Israeli Shipping Co. broke a lease in order to vacate the World Trade Center just days before the attack. Bollyn's source claims that Zim's lease extended through the end of the year and that the termination cost $50,000.

The company heading a consortium that had just obtained a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center was supposedly spared by a last-minute cancellation. According to the New York Times, Silverstein Properties had planned to meet on 9/11/01 on the 88th floor of one of the towers to "discuss what to do in the event of a terrorist attack," but cancelled the meeting Monday night "because one participant could not attend."

Maybe this is why America is dead set on destruction.


Post a Comment

<< Home