Thursday, May 18, 2006

Murder, Mud-Slinging, and Mendacity

A couple news articles caught my attention these past few days. First of all, according to Reuters,

An average of 70 civilians are killed in Baghdad every day, largely a result of the sectarian violence which has been on the rise since the 22 February attack on a revered Shi'ite shrine in Samarra city. Every month, the mortuary receives more than 1,500 bodies, not including the bodies of people killed in the north and south of the country.

Approximately 2 American soldiers die per day wasted in Iraq. The number of Iraqis in Baghdad alone is thirty-five times that amount. Now, the CIA-sponsored propaganda outlets, tightly controlling news emerging from Iraq, tell us that this is a result of "sectarian strife." Keeping in mind that, in Iraq, the perceived difference between Sunni and Shia is the same as that of a Methodist and Baptist in America--they aren't interested in slaughtering each other. Signs of the Times' comments on the problems in Palestine are noteworthy:

It really is an amazing coincidence that the Palestinians are slowly moving towards all-out war with each other rather than combining their forces to fight the illegal occupying Israeli force. Is it perhaps not clear enough to the them just who the enemy is? Have they somehow forgotten the hundreds of their own children that have been deliberately murdered by the IDF over the past 5 years? Of course not. As is true in the case of Iraq at the moment, an indigenous people do not normally respond to an outside aggressor by fighting and killing each other. Such a situation only develops as a result of deliberate provocation in the form of covert bombings and assassinations by a "fifth column" acting on behalf of the aggressor in an attempt to turn the conflict into an internal one and thereby destroy the resistance. It would appear therefore that Hamas, being originally a creation of Israel, or certain elements within Hamas, have been infiltrated in this way.

The sectarian strife is engineered by American, British, and Israeli special-operations mercenaries. This is documented.

Also, the Pentagon recently released the complete version of the infamous five frames of the Pentagon explosion in response to a request from Judicial Watch. As could be expected, neither of the two angles shows Flight 77. So, where is it? Apparently it is there somewhere, but for some reason, it doesn't seem to be reflecting sunlight. Odd, no?

In related news, CNN has been seeking to recover from their seemingly unforeseen blunder of letting Charlie Sheen's views appear on their hallowed broadcast. From Paul Joseph Watson:

CNN is trying to bait 9/11 truth activists to appear as guests on its programs and attack Charlie Sheen. William Rodriguez and Philip Berg appeared on the Alex Jones Show today to expose a smear campaign that seeks to poison the well of the 9/11 truth movement.

WTC survivor and truth activist William Rodriguez was contacted by the Anderson Cooper 360 show and asked if he would go on record as saying the new Pentagon footage dispelled all 9/11 questions. They also requested that he attack Charlie Sheen's public stance on 9/11.

One CNN researcher outright called Charlie Sheen a liar during a phone call with Rodriguez.

After Rodriguez refused to take the bait, telling them he supports Sheen 100%, CNN cancelled his appearance even as the car to pick him up was en route. Rodriguez said CNN were taken aback by the fact that he refused to bad mouth Sheen.

Lawyer Philip Berg and philanthropist Jimmy Walters were also approached by CNN and promised TV time if they agreed to debunk Charlie Sheen. Both refused.

Berg is representing Rodriguez in a RICO suit aimed at bringing charges against US government officials for complicity in 9/11.

Berg was set to appear on Neo-Con Glenn Beck's new CNN show before the slot was cancelled.

After host AJ Hammer and Showbiz Tonight were punished for their balanced 9/11 coverage, the show was bumped to a later slot and replaced by Beck's show.

This represents a coordinated effort to smear Charlie Sheen's viewpoints on 9/11 and poison the well of the wider 9/11 truth movement. CNN are shopping for news and trying to blackmail people into saying what they want them to say.

News networks claimed that the new Pentagon images discredited Charlie Sheen comments regarding what happened to Flight 77.

Can you see what has just occurred? Sheen, due to his celebrity status, managed to get his views aired on a CNN entertainment news show. He focussed on two important 911 issues: WTC7 and the Pentagon. Days before the Pentagon Strike flash presentation is presented at the Cannes Film Festival, the Pentagon releases blurry videos, claiming that these dispel the vicious conspiracy theories. Propaganda central CNN then attempts to do damage control on their error by attempting to get other celebrities and 911 researchers to smear Sheen and agree that the newly released videos show Flight 77.

It shouldn't be too hard to see what is going on here.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

The Pathocratic Nature of the Hunt

Today the Signs of the Times published an editorial of mine entitled The Pathocratic Nature of the Hunt. Please check it out.

Thursday, May 04, 2006

A Lesson in the Art of Lying

Here are the words of Donald Rumsfeld in an interview with ABC news on March 30, 2003:

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: [...] is it curious to you that given how much control U.S. and coalition forces now have in the country, they haven't found any weapons of mass destruction?

SEC. RUMSFELD: Not at all. If you think -- let me take that, both pieces -- the area in the south and the west and the north that coalition forces control is substantial. It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

Okay, so from this quote we can gather that Rumsfeld and his good friends "[knew] where [the WMD's] were. They [were] in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."

Now, recently Ray McGovern, ex-CIA anyalyst asked Rumsfeld about this oddity. Here's what he asked, and the answer he got in return:

McGOVERN: Why did you lie to get us into a war that caused these kind of casualties and was not necessary?

RUMSFELD: appears that there were not weapons of mass destruction there.

McGOVERN: You said you knew where they were.

RUMSFELD: I did not. I said I knew where suspect sites were and...

Watch the video. Notice that McGovern is being forcibly removed from the building for calling Rumsfeld on a documented lie. Not only that, the book-licking, anus-puckering sycophants cheer the bastard on. Excuse me while I vomit, but this is the stuff brainwashed Nazis are made of.

What happened? Why was Clinton impeached for lying about a blow-job while these fascists can get away with mass-murder? How can they lie about the justification for preemptive war, be called on those lies, lie in response to the questions, and STILL be praised by some people?

The sad thing is that this is not the first time Rumsfeld has been caught in a lie. Watch him here denying that he, or anyone he was aware of, at any time called Iraq an "imminent threat." He asks for citations, seemingly sure of himself that he will get none in return. Wrong.

Here's what Rumsfeld is quoted as saying:

No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

Rumsfeld realizes he has been caught. Watch how he reacts. He simply lies some more.

Oh, the wonders of these "humans" we call pyschopaths. Please, do yourself and those you love a favour. Learn what these people are capable of, and in the words of Georgie Bush/The Who, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, we don't get fooled again!"