Friday, March 31, 2006

Spread the Word, Send Some Email!

For those of you following Charlie Sheen's challenge for a real 9/11 investigation, here are some must-read articles:

Charlie Sheen Reinvigorates 9/11 Truth Movement

Venezuelan Government To Launch International 9/11 Investigation

The 'Fear Of Muslims' Conspiracy Theory

Also check out this site, and leave a comment! While you're in the letter-writing mood, also take the time to request of Oprah to air a series of shows dealing with real 9/11 research. Here's what convinced me to send her my thoughts:

9/11 Truth Calling Oprah!
An Appeal from

For more than five years now, the entire mainstream corporate news media apparatus has been controlled by a handful of behind-the-scene power brokers. In all that time there has been a total blackout on any mention, never mind discussion, of the truth behind the events of 9/11.

Despite their credibility and expertise, high-powered and extremely convincing voices of truth have been denied access to the public via the mainstream media. In the years following the attacks of 9/11, a significant number of knowledgeable people have attempted to alert the nation about the mountain of evidence that has been unearthed by their investigations, and which shoots large holes in the ‘official’ version of events sold to an unsuspecting and unquestioning public.

These people include former Bush administration officials, CIA analysts, FBI whistleblowers, scholars, academics, theologians and eye witnesses to the events of that tragic day. Not one of these people has been allowed to present his or her individual and collective conclusions that the Bush administration was either totally negligent or fully complicit or in the events of 9/11.

The media blacklisting of any and all members of the independent 9/11 truth community, no matter how impressive his or her credentials, has resulted in widespread ignorance of the huge number of anomalies and inconsistencies in the official version. No questions have been allowed to be raised, and not one shred of evidence that refutes the official version has been presented to the viewing or reading public anywhere but on the Internet.

Recent events, however, suggest that there may be a breach in this wall of silence. It seems that the only way for the 9/11 truth movement to attract the attention of the public is for well-known individuals in the entertainment arena to come forward and demand the truth.

Sad but true, a large number of Americans believe nothing until they see it on TV! There can be no question about the enormous influence and effect of television broadcasting on public opinion, a very frightening fact in these troubled and dangerous times. It was exactly for that reason that I created and dedicated these past years to exposing the lies and deception emanating from our broadcast news industry. And that is why I now am calling for help from one of TV’s most popular and respected performers.

Last week we witnessed a five-cent example of how the single TV appearance of a well-known performer, a celebrity if you will, could initiate a terribly important word-of-mouth grass roots movement. The support of one show-biz personality helped the 9/11 research community gain more attention than the efforts of hundreds of less famous people who have been trying for years to gain access to the corporate media.

Last week Charlie Sheen became a legend. He became the first celebrity (to attract the attention of the corporate media) to risk all to ask the common sense questions that formed in his mind when he examined the 9/11 crime scene evidence. Sheen’s brief appearance on CNN’s Show Biz Tonight showed how millions of Americans could be made aware of the convincing and damning evidence that has been hidden from them for years by our corporate criminal media.

Predictably, Mr. Sheen soon became a prime target of people who make the illogical argument that a valid message is not to be accepted if it arrives in even a mildly tainted envelope. As compelling as Mr. Sheen's comments and observations are, there will always be those who ignore his words even as they follow the Sean Hannity illogic of shooting the messenger when you can not defeat the message.

Sorry Charlie, - you will always be a hero to me for your efforts, but what we really need now is a Charlie Sheen heart and head in a bulletproof package. And I think I know who that package is.

I submit to my fellow 9/11 truth seekers and truth bearers that our effort to alert the public will be victorious if Oprah Winfrey gets on board. If we could convince Oprah to provide a platform for presenting the information that is in our possession, we’ll have it made. Oprah has been a champion for so many for so long that we can only hope that she has just half the courage and sense of duty of our new hero, Charlie Sheen.

Oprah Winfrey is the closest thing our generation has to a Walter Cronkite outside the news field. Her credibility and popularity are unmatched. Her words will ring loudly and people pay close attention to her program. And she comes without an iota of challengeable baggage.

Therefore, I am suggesting that a powerful, focused effort be made to inform Ms. Oprah Winfrey of the piles of evidence that give lie to the official story of 9/11. I also suggest that we try to convince this very powerful woman to use her show as a format for that evidence to be presented to the viewing public.

This has to be done carefully. The effort can backfire if a poorly planned, incoherent or unconvincing presentation is made to Ms. Winfrey who can place a nail in the coffin of the truth movement as quickly as she can blow the lid off of the suppression we have experienced.

For starters, here is what I would do if I were to make a presentation to Oprah Winfrey:

  1. I would ask her what she would think if she had a guest on her show whose child had been raped and the following had taken place: A neighbor of the child had written about the need to hire more local police, but had also written that the only way the people in the neighborhood would agree to that would be if there were a crime such as the rape of a child in the neighborhood! What if it also turned out that this neighbor had a long, complex connection to child molesters and it turned out he had vouched for several child molesters so that they could move into the neighborhood. Then I would ask her if she would seriously consider the possibility of that person’s involvement in the crime?
  2. I would then explain that this is exactly what happened on 9/11 when the members of PNAC, who wrote about the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" were running drills on 9/11 after George W. Bush had called off all investigations into the Bin Laden family and Al Qaeda.
  3. Next, I would implore her to watch the Second Edition of Dylan Avery's DVD, Loose Change. If that doesn’t do it, nothing will.

At this point, unless she has been compromised by the power elite of this nation, Oprah’s own intelligence and humanity would come into play. She could not possibly ignore the evidence if were to be presented to her properly. Then, if she chose to use her incredible power and public integrity, Oprah most probably could be the straw to break the back of the 9/11 cover story. She owns the forum that can bring inordinate attention to this topic. Exposure of the evidence on her show could encourage millions of people to have serious doubts about what they have been told by their government, and to demand answers to the questions that have been raised about the worst attack on our nation in history.

I truly believe that the evidence is so powerful that it will speak for itself. But it has to have an avenue to reach the people of this nation, all of whom have a right to see it and draw their own conclusions.

The ultimate goal would be for Oprah Winfrey to dedicate a week of programming to the evidence that has been collected by the independent 9/11 truth community and that has been kept from public view for all this time.

WARNING: If a gatekeeper goes forward with this and proceeds to make an unintelligible and unconvincing case, this effort will set us back to square one. We don’t want a repeat of the scene in A Few Good Men where Demi Moore's character provokes the judge into adding credibility to the opposition’s argument. Simple is better. The message should focus on the PNAC statement, the drills taking place on that day, the collapse of Building Seven and the still-living accused hijackers. The unstoppable force created by the information flow that follows will supply its own momentum.

I am offering my services to review and coordinate a presentation to Ms. Winfrey because I know how to keep the message focused and bulletproof. We cannot afford to be distracted by minutia or a myriad of theories. The last thing we need is to talk about a suspicious flash on a wing when we have authentic videos of the collapse of a 47 story building along with a confession about its destruction by its owner.

So, to those of you who seek the truth, and to those of you who suspect the truth and to those of you who know the truth about 9/11, I ask your help. Send out an SOS to Oprah Winfrey. Imagine if she were to receive tens of thousands of requests for a series of shows that would reveal the evidence that has been accrued over these years.

Please take five minutes of your time to send a message to the Oprah Winfrey Show, and let her know that you want a show about 9/11. And if you choose to do so, please add that I’d be happy to appear as a representative of the Truth Community. Here’s where you can type in your suggestion for a future show:

Monday, March 27, 2006

Something sounds familiar...

First, a couple follow-ups. Here's an amazing and disturbing video on the 11-person massacre mentioned in my post, The Purpose is Genocide. Watch it a couple times. Let it sink in. And pay attention to the final remarks. What are you doing while these people are being slaughtered? Every second you waste by accepting the lies that are regularly spoon-fed to you, every second you spend in an unaware, subjective stupour, you are supporting this massacre. Every moment you ignore the pull of conscience, the blood is on YOUR hands. What are you going to do about it? Maybe you can start a blog of your own? Spread the truth as best as you can.

In the news recently was a similar story. Here it is, in all its bloody glory, complete with US-military spin-management:

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's security minister, a Shi'ite political ally of Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, accused U.S. and Iraqi troops on Monday of killing 37 unarmed people in an attack on a mosque complex a day earlier.

"At evening prayers, American soldiers accompanied by Iraqi troops raided the Mustafa mosque and killed 37 people," Abd al-Karim al-Enzi, minister of state for national security, said.

"They were all unarmed. Nobody fired a single shot at them (the troops). They went in, tied up the people and shot them all. They did not leave any wounded behind," he told Reuters.

Shi'ite politicians had earlier said 20 people were killed at the mosque. The U.S. military's account of Sunday evening's incident said Iraqi special forces with U.S. advisers killed 16 "insurgents", arrested 15 people and freed an Iraqi hostage. The military denied entering any mosque.

Second, Charlie Sheen has responded to the MSM (mainstream media) slander campaign against him for calling a spade a spade. Here's a bit of what he had to say:

I dare you to print this email in it's entirety. [...]

Like so many other mainstream outlets, domestically and abroad, no attention whatsoever is given to the questions I raise or the evidence that stimulated those very questions.

Instead, low-brow idiotic hit pieces are spewed forth in an effort to sway the readers' opinion of the messenger while blatantly disregarding any of the potentially valuable content of the story. It's transparent sandbox propaganda as dated and cheap as the paper it's printed on.

Do a little research on Building Seven. Building Seven lives at the epicenter of my entire debate. Prove yourself worthy of genuine investigative journalism. Look at the video evidence.

Observe the same data I have. Submit a formal request to the Pentagon or the DOD to release video PROOF that flight 77 did exactly as they claim. You will be stonewalled. You will be dismissed unconditionally. If there is nothing to hide - why are they hiding it?

To avoid any confusion - I reiterate:

Building Seven - Pentagon video documentation.

And now, some doublespeak idiocy from Bill Frist, Big Friggin' Nazi. From the Baltimore Sun on March 20:

Sen. Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, thinks President Bush broke the law with his secret program to eavesdrop on Americans, and he wants Congress to censure Mr. Bush. He's right about the lawbreaking but wrong to think censure is the answer. [...]

Republicans on Capitol Hill, presented with the censure resolution, practically trampled each other to prove their slobbering devotion to the president. Sen. John W. Warner of Virginia assailed the proposal as "the worst type of political grandstanding." Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee accused Mr. Feingold of giving hope and encouragement to al-Qaida: "The signal that it sends, that there is in any way a lack of support for our commander in chief who is leading us with a bold vision in a way that is making our homeland safer, is wrong."

Just to make it a bit clearer: Bill Frist = Big Friggin' Nazi. Just ask Hermann Goering, also a Big Friggin' Nazi:

Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.

Who Is Really Controlling Suicidal US Foreign Policy?

Why is it that Bush and his controllers seem to be so inept? They have run their country into extreme debt, their military forces are spread thin in the Middle East, and it seems they are planning another war for Iran (if the recent acceleration of the WMD propaganda machine is any indication). Perhaps the answer will also explain why American foreign policy seems to not be American at all, but Israeli.

In this paper, John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago's Department of Political Science and Stephen M.Walt of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government contend that the centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy is its intimate relationship with Israel. The authors argue that although often justified as reflecting shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives, the U.S. commitment to Israel is due primarily to the activities of the “Israel Lobby." This paper goes on to describe the various activities that pro-Israel groups have undertaken in order to shift U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction.

But this leaves out the juiciest details. For example, what are we to think of the recent Israeli-Mauritanian black-mail scandal? As the editors at Signs of the Times say: is instructive as to the way in which the state of Israel manipulates the governments and media of foreign nations into blind obedience to the Israeli agenda, specifically:

"lured with tempting offers, including sexual relations with foreign women, bribe money, and promises of support in securing prominent job positions in return for their help in the Israeli endeavor"

Unbeknownst to the journalists [and politicians], the sexual encounters were then recorded, later to be used to blackmail the journalists (and politicians) by the Israeli embassy.

The Saudi paper explained that the Israeli ambassador would later approach the journalists [and politicians], threatening to release the videotapes if they did not cooperate with Israel.

These tactics have been used for decades by Israeli agencies within the U.S. to such an extent that, today, all branches of the American government have been entirely co-opted by Israel. The aforementioned Israeli agenda, by the way, is an eternal racist war in the Middle East until the Arab populations therein have been exterminated or completely subdued (most likely the former).

Of course, the end result of such a campaign will very likely include the destruction of the state of Israel itself along with the Jewish populations that live there. Then again, given that the Semitic Jews of the Middle East are, from a genetic point of view, almost identical to their Semitic, Arab Muslim brothers, it is probably more correct to say that the goal of Israeli leaders, who themselves are not of Semitic origin, is the destruction of all Semitic peoples of the Middle East.

Perhaps this explains why the US was so eager for war in Iraq, just who Congress was listening to, and why Iraq seems, against all reason, to be falling into civil war. Because this is JUST what the Israelis have been pushing for this last decade:

It is an idea pushed long and hard by the Israelis, as proposed in Oded Yinon’s A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties. “Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon,” Yinon wrote. It is precisely “inter-Arab confrontation” initiated through false flag provocative operations occurring currently in Iraq.

Perhaps it also explains why in their recent almost-excellent piece on 9/11 "conspiracy theories," New York Magazine writers Mark Jacobson and Janelle Nanos relate the following:

[...the Mossad theory] dovetails with the baseless rumor, widely believed in Arab countries, that 4,000 Jewish World Trade Center workers were told to stay home that day, showing that conspiracy theory can be tricky terrain. [emphasis mine]
A common theory, especially in the Arab world, holds that Israel orchestrated the attacks in order to bring the U.S. into conflict with Israel’s enemies. Evidence cited ranges from the [cle]arly spurious and deeply anti-Semitic (the oft-heard, oft-refuted canard that Jews were told to leave the towers before the attacks) to the apparently true but unexplainable. (Five men who were seen filming the attacks in Liberty Park were later apprehended and found by the Forward to have ties to Mossad.) [emphasis theirs]

but fail to mention that this is not simply a baseless, anti-Semitic rumour. It may not be entirely true, but even Haaretz Daily reports that the Israeli company Odigo received warnings before the attacks. Also:

According to reporter Christopher Bollyn, Zim American Israeli Shipping Co. broke a lease in order to vacate the World Trade Center just days before the attack. Bollyn's source claims that Zim's lease extended through the end of the year and that the termination cost $50,000.

The company heading a consortium that had just obtained a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center was supposedly spared by a last-minute cancellation. According to the New York Times, Silverstein Properties had planned to meet on 9/11/01 on the 88th floor of one of the towers to "discuss what to do in the event of a terrorist attack," but cancelled the meeting Monday night "because one participant could not attend."

Maybe this is why America is dead set on destruction.

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Charlie Sheen Gets Those Butterfly Wings Flapping!

For those of you living in a hole, Charlie Sheen has recently gone public calling for an independent commission into the "self-inflicted wound" of 9/11. Surprisingly, CNN has fairly covered this issue. Watch this movie clip and be astounded. Alex Jones puts his loud-mouthed, guest-interrupting antics to good use. Everyone needs wake up to this treasonous crime.

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Above Top Secret COINTELPRO Exposed

In my recent "fairy-tale" I mentioned the real perps behind the 9/11 false-flag operation had set up false sites and research to derail those seeking the truth. First, a little background. Above Top Secret hosts and promotes a poorly written and pathetic attempt to debunk the obvious lies surrounding the attack at the Pentagon on 9/11. Joe Quinn, at Signs of the Times, took the time to tear this piece of propaganda to pieces.

It seems he scratched a little too hard, and you can tell a lot about a person (or a government-funded COINTELPRO operation, for that matter) when they are scratched. Head over to Laura Knight-Jadczyk's blog to read all the details. ATS let their well-paid lawyers on the loose for, get this, copyright infringment. Again, read the posts on Laura's blog for the details. Needless to say, this is completely absurd. Joe published a valid critique of poorly-researched ATS internet forum post (!) and Signs of the Times is threatened with legal action?! Who has the time and money for such frivolous lawsuits backing up such obvious propaganda?

Well, the answer happens to be just as obvious. Who stands to gain by vectoring honest researchers into such nonsense as CatHerder's Pentagon debunking? What do they have to gain? More importantly, what do they have to hide?

The Purpose is Genocide

King and Most High Fuhrer Shrubbery recently fielded a query from Ms. Helen Thomas (denied this grace for years) concerning his repeated lies as to the motives for murder and military occupation in Iraq. The Great Bush replied that he certainly and truthfully, cross-his-heart-and-hope-to-lie, "didn't want war." You see, "9/11 changed everything," so, 9/11 9/11'd and then 9/11 just happened to 9/11 and we needed to 9/11 or else 9/11 would 9/11 and 9/11!

That explains everything.

Eloquence truly is the Shrubbery's forte. However, this very same day in the news we find a graphic depiction of the true purpose of this most malefic mass-murder. The answer is genocide, at the bidding of those whose plan it serves so well. From the official police report:

At 230 of 15/3/2006, according to the telegram (report) of the Ishaqi police directorate, American forces used helicopters to drop troops on the house of Faiz Harat Khalaf situated in the Abu Sifa village of the Ishaqi district. The American forces gathered the family members in one room and executed 11 people, including 5 children, 4 women and 2 men, then they bombed the house, burned three vehicles and killed their animals (map coordinates 098702).

They were:
Turkiya Muhammed Ali, 75 years
Faiza Harat Khalaf, 30 years
Faiz Harat Khalaf, 28 years
Um Ahmad, 23 years
Sumaya Abdulrazak, 22 years
Aziz Khalil Jarmoot, 22 years
Hawra Harat Khalaf, 5 years
Asma Yousef Maruf, 5 years
Osama Yousef Maruf, 3 years
Aisha Harat Khalaf, 3 years
Husam Harat Khalaf, 6 months

This is American (read Pathocratic) Justice. This is American (read Pathocratic) Democracy. This is what we will have to live the rest of our lives fighting.

Sunday, March 19, 2006

A modern fairy-tale

Greetings, fellow web-travellers. For those of you who happen to stumble upon this desolate corner of the web, I have a tale that is completely and absolutely absurd. In fact, when I first heard it I had to struggle to contain a smirk. I enjoyed a private derisive laugh and marvelled at the credulity of any poor chap that would believe such nonsense. Because it really is a whopper of a story.

Get this. Almost five years ago, some powerful little men decided something needed to be done. You see, history wasn't going the way they wanted it to, so they decided to nudge it along in their preferred direction. These men, after all, create their own reality. From such a lofty position, the lives that they had to sacrifice were mere figures on a computer print-out. They were ants that needed to be cleared for their royal procession. They planned for years, trained men for every part in this theatrical decption, blackmailed some, duped others. They sold the biggest lie imaginable.

Here's what happened. They hijacked four airliners. They murdered the passengers. They murdered the pilots. They installed drone technology in the planes and guided them to four targets. Two hit their targets. Not surprisingly, the fires were minimal. The firefighters had a handle on them. Then something happened. Yes, on 9/11, for the first time in history, the laws that supposedly run our universe were put on hold. Because on that day, a certain shrubbery and his flowery friends needed a miracle. And this shrubbery just happens to have the big guy on his side, and on this fateful day, received an enormous favour. Just this once, the big G, the eater of souls named Yahweh, caused three steel-framed buildings to symetrically collapse when none had done so before (nor since). No, they didn't topple. No, they didn't break into large pieces of rubble. Instead the very materials of which they were constructed exploded, causing the buildings to collapse at free-fall speed into their footprints. Nope, no need for resistance here.

What of the other two craft? Well, it seems one did NOT hit its intended target. We're not entirely sure where it is, but the passengers were no doubt executed and a more reliable plane was used in its place. Here too, physical laws were put on hold. At the pentagon, square pegs fit in round holes, large aircraft politely squeeze and fold themselves into cramped places. Pilots make impossible flight decisions to hit heavily (and newly) reinforced sections of wall. Then the craft manages to totally disintegrate, but leaves the remains of all passengers (sans any hijackers, because they went straight to hell, apparently) intact for DNA identification. But our dear protagonist, Donny Rumsfeld, escaped unscathed and unscrupulous.

And the fourth. Well, it seems here something went wrong. The passengers did not die. As they were taking control of the plane, a military jet shot them down, after several passengers made impossible cell-phone calls with technology from the future. Yep, that's right. From the future.

And after this ruse, these men connived and conspired. They "misspoke" and "told un-truths." In other words, oh horror!, they lied. They tagged the plan on an inept Osama (+ nineteen)! Never mind that he denied it , that many of the 19 turned up alive, or that the Osama-confessional was a fraud.

These people then published fake, manipulative debunkings to divert from the real issue.

Like I said, a complete and utter fairy-tale.

Who could do such a thing? Who could have a mind so audacious and devoid of conscience? What would the world be like if these people actually ruled over us? I'm afraid we've got a pretty good idea...